This statement has caused an upheaval, because if nationality requires that people living in a particular geographical boundary follow a culture, speak a language , have a faith, then claiming nationhood for India was not a very smart thing to ask for. However, this vision of the nation was not Indian. This vision can be applied to a model nation that emerged as a nation, which is not how India came into existence. This was not the vision shared by the Indian national movement. Our movement has laid the foundation for a newer approach: Unity in Diversity. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Indian asymmetric federalism recognizes that each state is unique. It supports more than one cultural identity. Democracy is used to deal with regional parties that raise ethnic issues. India has created a new model for addressing diversity. This model is best described as a nation-state. Accept that geographic boundaries or political differences need not coincide with cultural boundaries. This suggests that it is natural for a group of people sharing a common territory and culture to have their own state. A nation can basically be defined as a large group of people with strong identity bonds. National identity is typically based on common language, culture, history, religion, or ethnicity. India has declared itself a nation, with its own constitution and its own set of cultures and traditions. India has affirmed its secular nature in the Constitution. Indians practiced their own traditions, spoke their own language and so, gradually, some parts of India declared their desire to have their own set of rules and regulations and function accordingly. The reason why people come together to form a nation is because of a common factor that gives a sense of belonging. Nation can be described as a feeling, nation is an emotional concept. India is a union of states. The whole of India is not the sum of all the states but it is always bigger. And these States are in no way independent and autonomous entities but simply parts of them. India is not a conglomerate of independent nations. It is a state made up of many nations that want to grow and exist within it. We have nations from Kashmir to Kerala, from Assam to Maharashtra, from Gujarat to Rajasthan who have come together to be part of one state. They do not seek independence; they're just looking for a way to thrive independently. By declaring India as a state, we have also recognized the non-independent and non-sovereign nations residing in India on whom no national identity, national religion or national language will ever be imposed. under the notion of nationalism. For example, regarding the issue of Kashmir autonomy, India will not be threatened by the idea of ​​its autonomous functioning but, instead, will provide the same to all states. India accepted secularism and allowed Indians to follow any faith of their choice. India allows Hinduism to be Hinduism, Islam to be Islam and every other religion to be itself as long as they don't try to enter into an area they shouldn't be concerned about. Indian states have the status of cultural-linguistic-social countries. -democratic nations. Although they correspond to a central government, they also create their own autonomous governments. We defined India as a nation of many states as we believed that a strong central administration and weaker states can strengthen India.