IndexImplementation of Police Body Cameras Police Technology on Security Power and Finances Police Technology on Judicial System Integrity Conclusion I am Controversies have arisen regarding the ethics of police body cameras. The death of Michael Brown at the hands of a police officer has sparked a movement that police officers should wear body cameras to record their interactions with the public. The article will introduce the opposing arguments regarding the use of police body cameras in the field. This document will also discuss key arguments commonly expressed by both sides. Specifically, many argue that body cameras are an invasion of privacy, an abuse of power, and represent a high expense for local police departments. The paper will also discuss the safety and awareness that body cameras provide to the public, as well as how they provide great evidence for trials and transparency/accountability towards police officers. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayImplementing Police Body Cameras Police body cameras have been a controversial issue since their invention. The issue of police officers wearing body cameras began when 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot and killed. The importance of using police body cameras is to present how modern technology affects the justice system. There are many differences of opinion on whether police body cameras should be an official requirement. I will argue that police should be required to wear body cameras because this ensures safety and awareness, provides evidence for trials, and induces professionalism. Police Technology on Security Power and Finances Many would argue that police body cameras are a breach of conduct and are too expensive to install in every department in the country. A common concern is that police body cameras are an invasion of citizens' privacy. According to Emmeline Taylor, “body cameras are used to intimidate and also record in areas of high subjectivity and in overcrowded areas.” Police officers intentionally go to a high crime area and wait for someone to say something that is against the law (e.g. drug dealing). This would mostly affect undercover police officers because anyone could notice a uniformed police officer and they wouldn't speak at all. Most people feel like once a camera is in front of them, they have to start acting professionally otherwise it could be used against them. Police abuse of their power has been a major topic over the past two decades. According to Alex Sutherland, “it suggests an excessive use of force and an excess of what is often required of police officers”. Police officers use excessive force when trying to subdue a suspect, but excessive force is unnecessary. If a suspect cooperates with the police officer and follows all the directions given, there should be no need for the police officer to throw him to the ground or even start choking him. Unless the suspect cooperates with the police officer and threatens to harm him, then he has the power to do what he thinks is right to subdue him. Additionally, police officers have been known to use excessive force on stingrays.