India, a country where there is rule of law and the third pillar of government i.e. judiciary is considered to be the most trusted among all other pillars of democracy but questions about the highest authority of the highest institution i.e. judge Chief of India (CJI), in the Honorable Supreme Court of India on the issues of nepotism and abuse of power raises a very serious question regarding the accountability of courts and judicial mechanism in India. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay The allegations have been made by Justice J Chelameshwar, Justice Rajan Gogoi, Justice Madan Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph (all currently working as senior judges of honorable Supreme Court) on the current Chief Justice of India , Deepak Misra, on issues relating to selective assignment of important cases to judges of their lower rank, on the assignment of the case involving the mysterious death of Justice BH LOYA, who was hearing the famous Sohrabuddin fake encounter case and using discretion in send the cases to the selective banks. These issues were raised when the confidential letter written by these judges to the CJI became public and these judges held a press conference. The full details of the issues raised in the letter by the 4 judges are discussed in this article. Reviewing the controversial issue On January 12, 2018, four senior judges of the Supreme Court, Justice J Chelameshwar, Justice Rajan Gogoi, Justice Madan Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph, held a press conference and criticized the administrative discretions of Justice Deepak Misra and his style of distribution and apportionment of cases in the supreme court. In the first paragraph of the letter it was written that there are some orders taken by the Honorable Chief Justice which have adversely affected the overall functioning of the justice delivery system. According to them, some traditions of judicial administration were broken after a century. It has also been said that it is a well-established principle that the Chief Justice is only the first among equals, no more, no less. Justice Misra was also accused of working according to his own preferences. Two cases R.P. Luthra v. Union of India and Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association and others v. Union of India were also mentioned where the selection of judge was made arbitrarily by the Chief Justice of India. Violations of the procedural memorandum were also reported. The letter also said to rectify the situation and take corrective action for all the above-mentioned facts out of which the present dispute arose and the questions about the independence and effectiveness of the judiciary system remained. Justice Deepak Misra: A Brief Review Justice Deepak Misra, a person with legal experience having Justice Ranganath Misra (21st CJI) as his uncle joined the apex court on 10 October 2011 and became the Chief Justice of India (45th) succeeding Justice JS Kehar on 28 August 2017. He was admitted to the Bar on 14 February 1977 and practiced in the Orissa High Court and Service Tribunal. He was appointed as an additional judge of the Orissa High Court in 1996 and later transferred to the Madhya Pradesh High Court where he was appointed as a permanent judge on 19 December 1997. Before being appointed to the apex court he was the Chief Justice of Patna as well as the Delhi High Court. He will retire on October 2, 2018 when he turns 65. Justice Deepak Misra's name is associated with.