Reign of TerrorThe Reign of Terror was a radical event during the French Revolution with Maximillen Robespierre and Jean-Paul Marat. This event, depending on your opinions, could be justified, unjustified and mostly justified. In this period there were numerous executions, to which the government tried to reduce its problems. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay After the execution of King Louis XVI, hostilities with a number of European powers and excessive divisions within the National Convention brought the French Revolution into its most violent and turbulent phase. In June 1793, the Jacobins seized the National Convention from the expanded life of the Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, which included the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity. They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (la Terreur), a 10-month period in which the revolution's perceived enemies were guillotined through the skill of thousands. Many of the murders had been carried out on the orders of Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his personal execution on 28 July 1794. The Reign of Terror may have been justified. Before the Reign of Terror, the King and Queen of France were found guilty, by Robespierre, of being traitors in attempting to go to Austria to raise an army against the rebels. Thus the National Assembly was born. The National Assembly, under the leadership of Robespierre, was designed to give every man equal rights. The National Assembly was a new form of government, created to ensure that every man in France was equal. Also, to solve financial problems, with France in debt and poverty on the rise. The Civil Constitution of the clergy was made, according to which the clergy and the nobles now had to have the same things as the rest of the population, bringing together all the possessions into one. Vendée's letter to the National Convention expressed that the government was losing little to the rebels. This proves within the lines that “Without these departments [lack of troops], this unfortunate region would have fallen to the rebels today.” These documents show that the government was losing to the rebels, with its internal and external threats, which led the government to take extreme measures, thus justifying the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror may well be unjustified. During the control of the National Assembly they created the Declaration of Human Rights, created to guarantee the rights of the people, but it created gaps. In Document A, where some of the rights declared in the Declaration of Human Rights. The ninth law clearly states that “All persons are presumed innocent until found guilty…”, in other words, everyone has the right to a fair trial. However, in document D, there is a bar graph showing the number of people executed with or without a trace. The number of people executed without trial amounted to approximately 1,200 accused people, who could have been innocent. This makes the Reign of Terror unjustified because Document D contradicts what Document A states, proving that the government was unjust and corrupt. Furthermore, the National Assembly continued with its corrupt ways. They also abolished the monarchy, which was the form of government desired by most of France, so the National Assembly did not comply with the demands of the majority. Furthermore, it was known that the National Assembly was made up of Jacobins. The Jacobins were a party.