The argument for and against same-sex marriage has been going on for much of this century, and while it seems like we are ever closer to achieving equality, There's always something – or rather, someone – standing in our way. That someone could be the government or the older generation who still have their heads stuck in their butts. But for the sake of the article I'm analyzing, let's say that person is extremely religious. The article I chose for this essay is “'Gay Marriage' or Religious Freedom: You Can't Have Both” written by Benjamin Wiker, which – as I stated before, although it is already quite obvious from the title, is about the age old marriage versus religion argument because it's not as if church and state were meant to be separate or anything like that. This article was published in the National Catholic Register and based on that name alone – coupled with the title – leads me to believe it was written by a Christian bigot for other Christian bigots. To me, the article almost seems like a “call to action” from the author telling his audience that their morals are under attack by the government, although I wouldn't call a homosexual-hating bigot moral. I say this because, unfortunately, many Christians – though not necessarily all – have this same mentality, especially those who I would call extremists or those who only believe in “parts” of the Bible and do not believe in the Bible. other parties that go against their baseless argument. Basically they like to take mismatched Bible verses and turn them into something they can benefit from, but they hate being called out for their bullshit by other Christians who know they're not getting the whole story. plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay So, that “call to action” I talked about earlier. I think Wiker's purpose with this article was to convince his audience of the government attack not actually happening. He wants people to believe that their morals are at stake, in the hopes that maybe they will hate the marriage equality movement even more, because it's something he doesn't want, so he's trying to point out why other Christians won't want it either. . Personally, I think the only people who would be convinced by this argument would be closed-minded Christians, who are also stupid enough to believe that their “morals” are under attack that isn't even happening. I also see no problem with making changes that contradict their morals and beliefs, especially if those morals and beliefs are ignorant and are used to insult other people who are different. And frankly the idea of ​​“religious freedom” is complete bullshit. If religious freedom is just the white man's "right" to kill, attack, ridicule people based on their race, religion, and sexuality, then perhaps we should simply recognize that they have created an excuse to get away with killing and oppressing groups of people. that they are different, because they have in their stupid little heads that everyone is like them – or rather, they should be. As for Ethos, Pathos and Logos, I believe they are, in the same order: “will act as an instrument of continuing… sexual revolution against the Judeo-Christian understanding of sexuality and marriage”, “If the supreme power of the United States The Court affirms same-sex “marriage,” things will only get worse for Christians,” and as for Logos, I really can’t see an ounce of logic in this.