How does 1984 reflect on Never Let Me Go? These two literary masterpieces have in common and reflect on each other in many different points of view, but how? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay There is social stratification, from the most powerful to the weakest. Above the pyramid is Big Brother, whose function is to act as a viewfinder for everything. The Inner Party members (upper class), then the Outer Party members (middle class), and finally the Proles (lower class). We can observe another group, but isolated from this classification, which is the mass of slaves, coming from the equatorial lands, who constantly pass to the winner. The sacred principles of Ingsoc: Newspeak, doublethink, mutability of the past. He felt as if he were wandering in the forests of the seabed, lost in a monstrous world where the monster was himself. He was alone. The past was dead, the future was unimaginable. What certainty did he have that a single living human being was on his side? And what way to know that the Party's rule will not last forever? In this society there is no religious alienation, since religious practice was prohibited. The children are unaware of the strength they possess and the party members are blinded by their dominant ideology. There is an inequality of classes with respect to the goods they have. precisely, we can see that the descendants barely have food, while the members of the Inner Party enjoyed all the privileges that other classes did not possess. There are also inequalities of social status, due to belonging to a certain sector of the Party (internal or external) or because they are not part of it as children. The only difference that is not found in this society is political differentiation, since there is only one party, there are no discrepancies. Nor is there social mobility, horizontal mobility one that includes migration, cannot be given because the three powers, reflected in the book, are in a permanent state of war. Vertical, if possible, because it does not depend on the assets one possesses, but depends on an exam (which was done at 16 years old), based on this it can be deduced that there is no transgenerational lineage or lineage, because the belonging of these three groups is not hereditary. Power is exercised by the Inner Party, Big Brother being an image projected for people to focus their attention, their devotion and their fear. The only ability the outside has is to obey the orders that come from above. There is a total management of the population that leads them to think and remember what Big Brother says, a society that lives in fear and terror, which has no mental capacity to discuss, discuss and if they had it they were killed. A totally alienated society, from which they have stolen the ability to decide. A sad, disconcerting and harsh story, which analyzes from an almost cruel perspective the memory, family ties and invisible pains that support the possibility of the future. For Ishiguro, the future is a recombination of small terrors and hopes into a much larger perception of the culture's ethical and moral identity. Above all, the novel raises all kinds of questions about what we consider ethical, moral, and the invisible sufferings of transgression. The result is a distorted mirror in which the notion of individual and contemporary solitude is reflected from a dark point of view. There is nothing simple or pleasant about this grand picture of a society divided and fragmented by invisible horror. And much less on the conception of identity as an instrument of control. The plot proceeds at a good pace, full of secrets.