The Philippine media is a powerful tool used by various organizations to connect, inform, and influence their subscribed audiences. While this has great potential for its users, it is often used to convey biased information to convince the public to take a side. This is a critical essay on the research paper titled: “The Political Affiliations and Biases of the Philippine News Media” which talks about the different aspects of influence related to political subterfuge in the Philippines. While it is an article with good intentions to inform its audience, it seems like it may be lacking in execution, especially in terms of breadth and depth. The objective of this document is to identify these irregularities, as well as provide a probable solution to improve the document evaluated in terms of this deficiency. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The discussion on the introduction to biased media and the state of media in the Philippine context was well done with accurate supports from several credible sources. He showed multiple perspectives to promote the concept of what media should be as a corporeal base around which readers can revolve. The document also mentions instances where Philippine media has been biased both in the past and present, thus showing the prevalence of the problem as it continues to be timely and timeless; However, the author failed to elaborate on some points in the essay on biased media to support his position regarding this issue. An example of failed processing was providing meaningful information to enrich and deepen the argument. While the author felt it was important to address the structural rise of Philippine media along with biases on political issues, some points deviate from what the author aspired to illustrate. Focusing heavily on a few stations such as ABS-CBN and The Philippine Daily Inquirer to understand the reality of Philippine media, the author failed to demonstrate that other news and TV companies mentioned in the document were also biased in producing unbiased widespread results for the his reports. public. Providing multiple viewpoints to support his claim can reduce the Philippine media's inaccurate portrayal because, subject to the author's biases, the focus has deepened by contorting his position by throwing different opinions on the deliberate issue that are mostly insignificant to the overall argument. On the other hand, another inconsistency showed the complexity of the problem. The author failed to show several factors such as the roots and its implications of this issue, only managing to discuss the topic on a superficial level by providing examples that supported his statement. On top of that, the author has not even presented any real solution to the preceding and prevalent problem leaving readers selflessly open-handed and wondering “so what?” after reading the newspaper. That said, the author seems to have only hinted that this is a problem and proved it by providing evidence. Although the goal of the article was to inform, the author did not provide any insinuation as to what might happen when the media today is biased, proving that the problem in question is not serious. A plausible way to give depth to the topic might be to provide a solution to the problem. The media is a powerful tool that organizations often abuse and it is true that no source can be completely free from bias. Diffuse, react and connect are probable solutions that can.