The search for justice in Cambodia as a response to the Khmer Rouge atrocities from 1975 to 1979 was met with constant debate and political maneuvering. With the opening of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in 2003, it clearly illustrated the challenges and complexities of prosecuting perpetrators as a result of the changing interpretations and perceptions of the Khmer Rouge from 1970 to 2018. The slow path to justice reflects the frequent agendas oppositions of different states and individuals while the extent of the war crimes was questioned and questioned. This also included the changing definition and scope of genocide over time which developed an interdisciplinary study of the historiography of the Khmer Rouge. Over 35 years later, the severity of the crimes committed still affects Cambodian society today due to the immense suffering that occurred in the period 1975-79. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay As part of the international response, foreign journalists reported the harrowing experiences of civilians in the atrocities they had witnessed, and reports detailed incidents of executions, disease, and starvation. In the United States, officials in Washington had publicly denounced these wrongdoings, but the government was still reluctant to take action. The rest of the international community had remained largely silent during the Khmer Rouge period, despite the fact that a strong public stance against the atrocities had developed. In 1977, an issue of “The Nation,” the oldest and most popular weekly magazine in the United States, featured Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman in their article “Distortions at Fourth Hand.” Known as "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky's writings on the Cambodian genocide gained enormous attention due to his denial of the credibility of information that had emerged regarding the number of deaths and suffering. Chomsky has been cautious in avoiding blanket denial of the genocide, but has suggested that the belief that a genocide occurred has been built on fabricated evidence as he argues that "it is in this context that we must view the recent spate of newspaper articles, editorials and books about Cambodia, a part of the world that does not normally generate much interest in the press." the losses suffered by Vietnam. Although history is based on evidence, the evidence “blatantly distorts” and Chomsky sets out to prove this concept. Influenced by the rewriting of history that condemns communist atrocities rather than emphasizing their success and failure. American, the Washington Post soon began to focus on conditions in the Cambodian countryside. Chomsky carefully examines the content exposing many of the photographs believed to have been taken after being smuggled and had already appeared a year earlier in France, Germany, Australia. and in the Bangkok Post. This pattern was repeated among the analyzes of experts who cited statistics from various mass media without a reliable source. On April 17, the Boston Globe published an article that read: "Most foreign experts on Cambodia and its refugees believe that at least 1.2 million people have been killed or have died under communist rule since 17 April 1975". No source is provided. Questioning the stability of a “historical fact” is evident and Chomsky has shown how imperfect evidence can have an impact on.