IndexRogerian Argument Essay OutlineIntroductionStructure of King's Persuasive ArgumentResponse to OpponentsState King's PositionProposal for a ResolutionConclusionExample Rogerian Argument EssayThe message depicted in the letter: listening with understandingRogerian Argumentation Essay OutlineIntroductionIntroduction to Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail"Mention King's Persuasive ApproachStructure of King's Persuasive ArgumentRogerian Argument as a StructureAddress the Problem and Position of OpponentsRespond to OpponentsSummarize clergymen's views Recognize and challenge clergymen's arguments Affirm King's position Present evidence to support his position Demonstrate the merit of his position Motion for a resolution King's proposal for justice and common ground Rogerian appeal to self-interest on both sides Conclusion Summary of the King's Persuasive ApproachThe Effectiveness of King's ArgumentSample Essay on Rogerian ArgumentIn the Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. uses a persuasive speech to respond to opposition. King structures his language to follow a similar method to the Rogerian argument, which fights oppression against humanity. By clearly stating the issue, reiterating his opponent's position and the merit he holds, summarizing his own position, demonstrating why his position has merit, and concluding with a proposal that appeals to both sides of the conflict, King successfully counters the letter of the priest with equity. and honesty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The message portrayed in the letter: listening with understanding The letter from Birmingham Prison is presented in a dialogic manner, rather than in a monologue. King restates the general problem and then proceeds to summarize what his opponents have said. The resistance arose from a public statement by eight Alabama priests. In this statement the religious condemn his actions and support the injustice demonstrated by the police. King is able to show an understanding of the positions of the clergy and different perspectives from across America by summarizing the views of the clergy. He acknowledges their arguments, giving them equal respect and definition, and then challenges them, explaining their flaws. For example, King addresses the accusations made against him and proceeds to explain why the accusations were unfair. A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority who, because they were denied the right to vote, had no role in the enactment or development of the law. It also draws attention to the clergy's disapproval of the demonstrations and explains why their position has no merit. The demonstrations taking place in Birmingham are deplored. But his statement, I'm sorry to say, expresses no similar concern about the conditions that led to the demonstrations. He gives merit to their argument, but then detracts from their complaint. This technique convinces the reader to take King's side because it has eliminated the value of the opponent's position. In summarizing his position, King presents examples and then concludes by emphasizing their importance and significance for the fight for equal human rights only after having responded. to the opposition. These facts include: the ugly record of brutality, grossly unfair treatment in the courts, and unsolved bombings of black homes and churches, supporting his position. The Rogerian method..
tags