Cloning has been a controversial topic around the world since before Dolly the sheep was cloned in 1996, and has recently turned into a real possibility that appears to be considerably more achievable now than it was twenty years ago. (National Human Genome Research Institute n.d.) The achievement of having the ability to clone a creature has prompted researchers to think about a more difficult task, cloning people. To begin with, cloning is a procedure that involves grouping the same cells or living beings that all come from a single individual. It is not known when or how human cloning will become a possibility. However, it is understood that there are two possible ways to clone people. The first method involves breaking the fetus into a few pieces and creating numerous new people from that embryo. (Wikipedia, 2018) The second approach to cloning a human involves taking cells from an existing individual and cloning them, thus creating different people identical to that specific individual. (Wikipedia, 2018) With these two techniques almost available, two crucial questions arise. Can we do it, and would it be a good idea for us too? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The idea of ​​cloning humans is ethically wrong and should not be supported. Some people don't seem to understand the negative effects that cloning would bring to the world. Religious perspectives, population expansion, and the personality of each human being are just some of the supporting reasons that oppose cloning and argue why it should not be legalized. Just because there are a couple of variables that might seem helpful, that doesn't negate the harm it would do. An advocate of cloning, Simon Smith, says it is useful to create clones for fertility reasons, for example for infertile couples and for couples carrying hereditary diseases. (Smith, 1998) This statement seems reasonable; however, there are other more suitable alternatives such as adoption, artificial insemination and surgical interventions. It seems to be controversial whether a man needed to create a clone of himself would be a degenerate or selfish to have to do such a thing. There are supporters of cloning, for example Professor Robert Winston, who argue that cloning would be a viable alternative accessible to those individuals who have lost a friend or family member in death. (Wikipedia, 2018) Have we neglected our ideals and the fact that with the introduction of life one day will come? It's not something most people expect for themselves or someone they care about, yet it will inevitably come to each of us one day. Everyone's personality is also another factor to consider when thinking about the outcome that cloning would bring. What drives you to care for them and bond is the personality of people and different animals, not their physical appearance. Having a clone that is similar only in appearance and not in identity or character would not bring back a lost loved one. On the contrary, it may even make it significantly more difficult for people to cope with and manage it. If clones were created, we would lose that uniqueness. Having human clones in the presence would be an insult to the humanity and uniqueness of each person. It would change the human being. The clones could probably turn into another minority fighting for equal rights. Would you be able to imagine what it would be like to realize that you are a clone of another person? Would you feel inferior about human life and all that it entails? Would you even have a soul?.