Topic > Risk of Terrorist Financing in Nonprofit Organizations

Looking at an orphanage evokes feelings of compassion and empathy. Nothing else. And it is precisely for this reason that these organizations constitute the ideal disguise for terrorist financing. An NGO that helps provide water to African children seems harmless on paper. But that's exactly where you might see it. It wouldn't exist in reality. Even if that were the case, the money from the donations would not translate into drinking water. It would instead be used for something much more sinister, providing funds to terrorist organizations. This jeopardizes the integrity of charities and enables terrorist activity. Non-profit organizations (NPOs) that appear most at risk typically perform acts of service in close proximity to active terrorist threats. The NPO sector in the global community is vibrant and provides aid to millions of people. There are five identified categories of abuse and risk towards NPOs as established by the FATF (Financial Action Task Force). Fund diversion is an important method that involves actors within the NPO or foreign partners responsible for the diversion. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The second category involves NPOs or officials who direct the maintenance of an affiliation with a terrorist entity; knowingly or unknowingly. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have also been used as cover for terrorist group recruitment, making this the third category. The fourth classification includes program abuse where the resources were genuine but the programs for which they were used were illegal. Finally, some terrorist entities use false representations to deceive others. They present themselves as fake NPOs to deceive donors into giving their support. African countries have been shown to have more cases of terrorist financing through NGOs. This can be attributed to the fact that there are numerous terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and ISIL present in the area. The resilience of Al Qaeda's network is the result of its ability to distribute its communications and diversify its financial and recruiting networks. Similarly, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) operated its global logistics network through numerous NPOs and subsidiary charities. Ultimately, however dissimilar their objectives may be, terrorist networks and NPOs exist in the same global environment, focusing on the same population. Humanitarian NPOs often want access to populations in contact with local or foreign conflicts to carry out their activities. good job as terrorist movements try to access the population to aggravate the forces of the conflict. Most of these cases of terrorist financing through NPOs are identified from information provided by public informants, audits of existing NPOs and NPO applicants, collection and analysis of mandatory NPO reporting, as well as web crawling and terrorism watchlists. Dismantling these organizations involves denying registration to NPOs, suspending their activities, imposing fines, freezing their accounts and prosecuting them. While low-impact cases are often resolved by minimally invasive measures to NPO operations, high-impact cases involving complicit NPO officials often warrant more intrusive methods of disruption. An example of this was the fund.