Topic > Analysis on how John Locke's philosophies inspired Simon Bolivar to fight for Venezuela's freedom

Simon Bolivar is a Creole who grew up in a wealthy family. Bolivar dedicated his time and efforts to fighting for Venezuela's independence from Spain. To do this, Bolivar was inspired by the Enlightenment ideas of John Locke. John Locke explains the state of nature in which people find themselves. The state of nature is when people are able to do what they want without the control of a government. However, his Enlightenment ideas state that people must follow government rules and regulations to stay safe from the law, but they must also follow the needs of the people. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original EssayAccording to John Locke, if the government does not live up to what the people have asked and demanded, the people of society have the ability to overthrow the government and regain political control. Creoles and other people in society struggle to gain independence and freedom from their Spanish governments, but Locke's Enlightenment ideas help them better understand what to do and what not to do when ruled by a government. "We have already seen the light and it is not our desire to fall back into darkness..." (bolivar)Simon Bolivar talks about the situation of the Creoles with the Spaniards. It describes how the Creoles were able to see freedom in the past and how they almost achieved it. However, the Spaniards prevent them from achieving their goal: obtaining freedom and peace. “…whenever the legislators attempt to take and destroy the property of the people, or to enslave them under arbitrary power, they place themselves in a state of war with the people.” (Locke, 2). Here John Locke explains what people can do when the government fails to fulfill its duties to the people. If the government tries to take and ruin the property of its people, society has the ability to overthrow the government because their natural rights are not respected and there is no compromise between the people and the government. Therefore, both Bolivar and Locke have the same ideas regarding government control. They both understand what could happen if the government did not respect the natural rights of the people and the consequences that could result from this. On the other hand, Bolivar reveals the idea of ​​how the Creoles are cut off from any source outside the country. their lands, but Locke conveys the idea that there is a way to escape from matter and communication. The Creoles had great difficulties: “As I have just explained, we were cut off and, as if we were removed from the world in relation to the science of government and administration of the State” (Bolivar, 4). Creoles had no way to be part of the Spanish government, nor did they have the ability to participate in trade. The Spanish had blocked any communication the Creoles might have attempted to reach. Furthermore, they may not have had the ability to be merchants or even traders because Spain was so greedy. They focused all their attention on the Creoles' way of working, but never on their desirable needs. Therefore, traders or even Bolivar traders because Spain was so greedy. They focused all their attention on the Creoles' way of working, but never on their desirable needs. Therefore, Bolivar expands the idea of ​​how Creoles were mistreated in government areas as well. Locke states: “…no one can be put out of this state and subjected to the political power of another without his consent” (Locke, 6). In this writing Locke describes that people have their own decision to be part of government control. People have a say in whether.