If God is something that has a mystical and mysterious property, the God that human beings talk and think about would necessarily be an exclusively metaphor, since God, by Christian's own admission (is been raised Roman Catholic, if that means anything here), is not something we could ever hope to fully understand. I'm not saying that God doesn't literally exist, I'm simply saying that we lack the ability to think and talk about God in a way that, for lack of a better phrase, does Him justice, then any human reference ever made to or about God it is on or about a metaphor. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayAs I write this, however, I am wondering whether or not it is possible to understand an absolute, complete, and undeniable truth about something if that something is not completely, but only partially known, since the answer to this question would serve as the kernel or bane of the my position above: that the God that human beings talk and think about is exclusively a metaphor. This question leads me to look for a metaphor, or rather an analogy of mine to provide as an example whether a partial truth can actually be a truth or not. Let's say for example you know a person. There are many things you know are true, or at least you tell yourself so. Throughout your life there may be things that you thought were true about someone that turned out to be wrong, but perhaps most of the things, and perhaps even your belief about what that person is at their core, were true. If we accept this we can never truly know a person in their entirety, or perhaps, to be more generous, we will never be able to truly understand most people we meet, so we may be wrong about any particular thing we assume about that person , as they may not be what we initially interpreted them to be. However, this is not how people in general behave, there is a significant probability that what we believe someone to be true is false. If people behaved this way, things like eBay, which of course Dr. Peterson references in the video (or maybe the last one? They're so wonderfully long) wouldn't work. If people acted as if their assumptions about people were unlikely to be wrong, no honest individual would buy from the site, as they would see a deterrent likelihood of being scammed. And I think this is a great example of faith, which of course is how belief in God is often (or always?) defined, even by those who hold to that belief. So, to answer the question that arises from my initial argument: perhaps a partial truth is not an absolute truth, but if it is not and we always operate with the belief that this is the case, society would not function and complete and absolute truth would result probably the collapse of all perception of reality, so a faith of at least some kind is necessary for any useful or meaningful endeavor, such as understanding what we are talking about when we talk about God. And so this commentary does not end with an emphasis on his thesis, but rather in support of the thesis he was attempting to refute. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay So yeah, then. Not only does God exist as a metaphor, but he may very well exist, and if one has faith, he literally exists as defined by a doctrine, even with aspects that, it is reasonable to expect, will never be known, much less understood, in the course of human existence mortal.