The documentary "Under the Dome" highlighted the severity of the air pollution crisis in China. It showed the harmful effects it is having on the millions of people who live in the area and exposes the companies responsible for allowing this to happen. This stems from the fact that oil companies have extreme power in government decision-making on environmental matters. All their environmental decisions have taken a back seat to ensuring their economic interests are protected. Chai Jing not only exposes this crisis, but shows the realistic outcome of what will happen if they continue to do what they are doing. Her passion stems from her son being a victim of China's air pollution problem and her extensive research led her to create this documentary which was a catalyst for promoting change in China's environmental policies and regulations. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayThe reason the documentary is banned where it was made is because it exposes the current nature of the Chinese environment with a myriad of hard data to support it. More importantly, the documentary was banned because China's oil industries did not like being exposed to such a level. She analyzed air pollution over a long period of time and was able to highlight a significant problem in the way people lived, especially in Beijing. Although Beijing was one of the hardest hit cities, over the past 40 years there have been many others in the area that have been severely affected due to the extent of air pollution. Chai Jing has actually made his case against a number of high-ranking government officials who are putting the lives of their own people at risk due to their business practices. They valued money more than the health of their people and the community members they served. This shows how far these oil industries will go to protect their economic interests. This is something that has been prevalent all over the world. Many countries put their economic interests before the environment because this is a world run by the value of a dollar. Saving the environment does not bring money into the economy, which is why there is a lack of people investing in it. This documentary demonstrates the impact that long-term pollution has had on people in such a densely populated area. This has exposed the population to increased chances of lung cancer and reduced growth of children in the area. The reason the video is so dangerous is because it is something that people in China have been dealing with for years and are only now feeling the ramifications of the conditions they live in. Chinese residents would be angry watching this because their families' lives are at risk and it could explain some of the diseases people have contracted. China is very densely populated, so when this video was released it must have sparked public outrage. People likely felt as if they had been betrayed by their government and could potentially respond with uproar. Mothers and fathers in the area are most likely in shock as they try to understand the scope of the situation. Considering that things haven't improved much, it's no surprise that the documentary was banned. The government and oil companies feared the reactions of people who would watch the video because they would know who was responsible for causing such extreme damage to theirliving conditions. Additionally, many people in China work in the iron, coal, and steel industries, so the number of jobs that would be lost due to calls for safer practices would be extreme. What's even worse is that in some cases the pollution is getting worse. This shows that although people understand the problem of smog, ash and emissions from these factories polluting the air, there are people who choose to ignore them for their own monetary gain. Societies around the world still do not take environmental issues as seriously as they should. Many places don't see the consequences of their environmentally harmful actions, so they continue to carry them out. Companies like Exxon have the money to be able to pay off lobbyists and many other government officials so they can do whatever they want regardless of its impact on the Earth. It is now clear that money is the root of the problem of protecting the environment. The investment that comes from saving the environment requires a monetary sacrifice for an environmental gain that cannot be quantified in dollars. People are used to waiting until the last second to make changes. With this problem it's simply more of the same. Our government will not make the environment a priority because it is more widespread than it seems and it is a problem that needs to be solved immediately. Over time, several events have occurred where environmental atrocities have decimated lands for the sake of economic gain. Places like Mexico City and Los Angeles suffered extensive environmental damage due to the severe pollution these cities were exposed to. Los Angeles has done very well in recent years in cleaning up air pollution in the city. This comes from the implementation of new technologies along with the help of new policies and regulations. For the last 40 years there has been evidence of smog blanketing Mexico City. That's why it was recently discovered that Mexico City has the worst smog in the world. Poor air quality has led to thousands of deaths and many more hospital visits. The residents of Mexico City fought back and were able to gain greater influence in the fight for cleaner air. People forced the government to work for cleaner air and their efforts were rewarded. After pushing factories to adopt more energy-efficient methods, there was a significant drop in the amount of air pollution hanging over the city. The silver lining in all of this is that Mexico City is now a model for other cities to follow in their mission to fight air pollution. People have forgotten about these environmental atrocities because they simply don't care that much. There are many people in the world who think that the environmental problems we see daily will disappear or somehow solve themselves. It's an ignorance perpetuated by the media that doesn't pay enough attention to issues like this. If more people could see the before and after effects of being persistent and caring for their environment, it would do wonders by allowing people to understand what effect they might be having on their habitat. The word that has somehow circulated in communities across the country over the past couple of years is that trying to save the environment won't help because it's already too late. The mindset that needs to be adopted is that if people start taking action now, they will still be able to make a difference because they can. If every person could adopt this mindset, then we could make a great deal of progress in our efforts to preserve what is left of our environment. Make the decision.