History shows that many people are threatened when the path of human rights is not followed. All governments need the cooperation of all parts of society to prevent terrorism because no other country can solve terrorism alone. Therefore, universal human rights norms should be respected for international cooperation in preventing terrorism at all levels. Respect for universal human rights is essential for human freedom and security. This article talks about the war on terrorism and human rights which mainly focuses on the United States. Terrorist threats have been present throughout history, but the one that shocked the entire world was 9/11, with government support, it created the threat that undermines the human rights framework with which the international community must deal threats affecting global security. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay At the heart of every counterterrorism effort is the recognition that all human beings have the right to safety and life. All governments have a responsibility to ensure that these rights are recognized and observed, and effective strategies must be used to prevent and punish life-threatening acts because no human rights defender denies this responsibility. The human rights framework is based on this recognition, but the right to security must respect the human rights framework. Just as States must prevent the occurrence of human rights violations within their territories. States must protect those within their borders from "terrorism". In fact, the international community has confirmed that 9/11 terrorism must be considered according to basic standards of human rights and international law, but will they really work? The terrorist was detained in Guantanamo where detainees were arrested without trial, without due process of law, without any legal authority, and detainees are imprisoned indefinitely. This is clearly a threat to the human rights regulatory framework. Many questions have been raised by the arrests of the detainees. One of the most important measures taken by the United States is the arrest, detention and violence of suspects or terrorists. The report shows that the detainee is repeatedly interrogated and deprived of basic human rights, such as lack of sleep, being confined to a confined room, standing for a long time or violence. It is a serious violation of human rights. The use of violence or even torture during enemy investigations to obtain vital information is not a new and widely used method in the past. But taking such measures goes against the globally accepted idea of ​​human rights. Although the ICRC allowed the detainees to be visited, the United States viewed the detainees as enemies and did not agree that the detainees received protection under humanitarian or human rights laws. However, it cannot avoid due judicial process or basic human rights standards to protect detainees. In the case of an Afghan taxi driver named Sayed Abassin, who was arrested and interrogated over and over for lack of sleep and tied up without a lawyer or simply court proceedings? He was detained in Guantanamo for a period of 1 year and was released without trial. Demonstrates, in compliance with international human rights or humanitarian standards, to create abuse and harm tolife and rights of others under the arbitrary exercise of executive power. This is an “injustice” prosecution of alleged terrorist crimes against the United States. This is a very serious violation of human rights that goes against the law of justice and human rights. It is also against the principles of promoting human rights and freedoms. The rule of law is an essential foundation that we must respect. It's not that anyone with power can do whatever they want, using their power to bully or violate other people's rights. In reality, it doesn't matter how bad or evil someone is labeled. Respect for the rule of law must take priority and ensure equal protection for all. Furthermore, the fact that many Arabs and Muslims are arrested in the United States on terrorism charges has led to discrimination. It has been proven to be unsafe for people in the United States involving a certain race or religion. It violates international norms that prohibit discrimination based on nationality or religion, which makes the anger more intense. Since the event of 9/11, we can see that the human rights legal framework does not prevent governments from issuing criminal warrants. This makes terrorism less likely where government law should not infringe on freedom of expression in areas such as religion. The United States adheres to a human rights framework under which terrorists can be considered criminals given a fair trial. But this shows that governments can take additional steps to manage secrecy or evidence in accordance with the legal system. This is a loophole that can make a terrorist accused in an ongoing trial. It has been explicitly recognized that there may be an emergency where international human rights protections, such as Article 4 of the ICCPR, must be formally declared in an emergency and to the extent that they do not cause discrimination based on race, religion, skin color and must not conflict with other international laws. But in the case of many Arabs arrested in the United States after 9/11, the emergency was not reported. Furthermore, this also includes the impossibility of punishing or torturing prisoners in any form for violating human freedom outside of a critical situation. Indeed, the human threat is not only a war on terrorism, but also things like poverty or the lack of basic human rights. rights. The control of terrorism has limited people's lives in terms of well-being, food and shelter, as the focus of the war on terrorism ignores other challenges affecting human security that may be equal or greater. There are other challenges that impact human security, such as education, attacks on women, famine and lack of access to basic human rights or well-being. These are also urgent challenges that need to be addressed. It is true that terrorism has a serious impact on human security and should be addressed. But the war on terrorism ignores other causes of human insecurity and destroys norms of human rights and human security. As for the violence that happened in Thailand, if it was an area known to many, it would be the violence in the three southernmost provinces, namely Pattani, Yala. and Narathiwat. It is not just about deaths or injuries caused by acts of violence, whether by the government or rebel movements. But it also leads to human rights violations in many ways, for example, a child in an area directly affected by death, injury, detention and, being affected indirectly, becomes orphaned due to violent incidents. Human rights refer to the universal rights through which all human beings are born beingsequal, with dignity of humanity, freedom of thought and action that no one can offend. And basic human rights are the basic needs for self-survival and development which have four factors: free and stable life, but as a result conflict, basic human rights have been violated due to events accumulated in the past. Thailand's southern border provinces is where the conflict between the Malay Muslims was fought and expanded their struggle for independence from Thai rule. According to the history of the past, history shows that this area was originally a Patani town in the past. But due to the agreement between Thailand and the United Kingdom that forced Thailand to rule by forcing the fusion of Malay culture and religion, it poses a threat to the Pattani identity in the region, leading to much resistance and violence. These areas were the fighting areas for the Pattani movement and the Thai government. Shootings and harassment prompted government retaliation. In the past, violence arose as a result of the actions of both parties, security agents and the Patani Movement. 6,000 people died and 10,000 were injured. In this violent situation, the group of people considered violent are Muslims. Therefore, in the event of violence, the government will declare a state of emergency and promulgate special laws with the arrest of defendants for 35 days without the right to see a lawyer and a trial of violence against detainees. This incident was seen to constitute a serious violation of human rights, similar to that of Guantanamo Bay. Also, it seems like religion is involved. This is contrary to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which Thailand has certified. From the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1 states that individuals enjoy the rights and freedoms set out in this declaration without any distinction. Such as race, color, sex, language, religion and political opinion. In the case of a 44-year-old man, he said more than 100 police, military and other forces surrounded his home, with his wife and two children in the home, a 17-year-old son and a 15-year-old daughter, and two of his friends, causing accidents. A clash between the officers and the people present in the house, which leads to death and arrest. She said the officers had attacked her son, slapped him and killed him. He was very sad that he had been treated so cruelly. He was arrested and interrogated repeatedly with sleep deprivation and was assaulted during the investigation and there are still many cases that have been treated unfairly in this way. Those who were tortured have a feeling of fear, paranoid, fear of being repeated, wanting revenge, not wanting to live. They were afraid of being killed and had to live as homeless people because they were still in conflict situations and could not change their paranoia and the need for violence in response. Furthermore, the lack of an unfair trial is due to the delay in the processing of the law and the severity of the extraordinary. Extraordinary jurisprudence is a case where the death results from an officer claiming to perform duties or death while in the officer's custody. Initially, the officers were accused of making the deaths public, but authorities claimed that the dead had first used weapons on them. Due to the extraordinary cases of murder involving government officials, the power to investigate and seek evidence to establish the facts is the power of government officials. The dead cannot demand justice. In detention under special laws, release is rejected by society. Although in some cases there are reports of torture. But nothing can be changed because the authorities have the attitude of respecting the