Index IntroductionApple against the FBIConclusionIntroductionIn today's society, technology has become one of the most used and desired events of the millennium. This essay on the dispute between Apple and the FBI focuses on the question of whether Apple should be forced to create new software that allows the FBI to access data from locked iPhones, and I argue that Apple should not comply due to concerns about personal information , setting a dangerous precedent, and potential damage to their reputation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayApple vs FBIAlthough the FBI collaborates with Apple to investigate a domestic terrorist attack, I argue that Apple should not collaborate with the FBI due to personal information/user trust, dangerous history, and damage to their international reputation. Apple argues that the court cannot force speech from the company, particularly when speech would be against Apple's interests. Customers want their personal information to be secure so that others cannot access it without authorization. Apple accesses personal and confidential data to defend customers stored on its devices. Value of personal data and people's opinion about it Indeed, personal information is important to everyone. Giving authority the power to invade our privacy creates an easy way to violate its power and deprive citizens of their constitutional rights. The invention of the new operating system will also set a dangerous precedent for future societies that will affect everyone negatively. Apple firmly believes that creating this necessary backdoor system will create a risky chain of effects that will affect everyone from smartphone users to social media companies and their privacy. Apple, a famous billion dollar company, has been so successful in protecting the protected information of its customers. In “Forcing Apple to Hack That iPhone Sets a Dangerous Precedent,” Darrell Issa oversees statistics and past evidence to effectively convince his audience of governors that they must believe whether or not Apple should force the hack because it could lead people to a dangerous situation. situation and neglect the purpose of protecting people's privacy. Ultimately, Apple could have lost customers to its reputation by changing the security of its cellular products. If Apple had chosen to create software for this particular problem, there would be no restrictions on government data invasion. The argument has already been raised that creating software that can access a locked device could give hackers access to attack many other people's devices. I agree that Apple shouldn't create new software to unlock your phone because once a lock is created there are no limits to who or how the encryption can be applied. While Apple products end up feeling less secure, the result enhances Apple's reputation as a privacy advocate and its claim that strong encryption isn't a detriment to security. After all, it is rare for cell phone information to be totally and completely inaccessible. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion In conclusion, the debate over whether or not Apple should create new software to allow the FBI to access data from locked iPhones is a complex issue with significant implications.