Index Climate change Climate change skeptics Importance of China in the climate change debate Paris Climate Agreement Persuading developing countries to reduce emissions of carbon Conclusion Climate change The emission of carbon gases into the atmosphere causes climate change. Global warming is the result of greenhouse gases trapped in the atmosphere. These gases have enormous impacts on the environment, including rising ocean levels, increased temperature levels, extreme storms, reduced food crops, and droughts, to name a few (Shorr 2014). Several talks held before the Paris summit did not produce the same fruitful results. There have been several summits aimed at convincing countries around the planet to reduce their carbon emissions. It is truly unfortunate that most of these meetings ended without resolution (Oberthür & Wyns 2015). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay However, in December 2015, France held a successful meeting, which saw China and other countries agree to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to reduce their impact on the environment. The summit brought together countries who agreed on several resolutions that, if implemented, would have positive implications for environmental change (Jayaraman 2015). This article seeks to address the arguments of climate change skeptics, China's prominence in the Paris summit, and the policies they are pursuing to address global warming. Furthermore, an analysis of the summit and the reasons for the difficulty in persuading developing countries to reduce carbon emissions will be drawn. Climate change skepticThere is a problem, a really big problem. The world should find a solution and make a change in it. However, individuals masquerade behind the excuse that it promotes climate skepticism. Sibley and Kurz state that climate skepticism is propaganda claiming that global warming is nothing but natural and this; human activities have absolutely nothing to do with any of this. These individuals try to use all means to prove that climate change is a scam. Furthermore, they seek to discredit actual and authentic climate findings using bogus scientific research. McKibben's argument, however, dispels the doubt that humans are not responsible for anomalous climate change (McKibben 2014). The discovery of the hole in the ozone layer generated by CFCs refutes the arguments against humans as the cause of the unusual changes in the environment. Furthermore, governments with a huge stake in this try to hide the ugly truth from the general population by spreading uncertainty and false information (Sibley & Kurz 2013). Importance of China in the climate change debate According to Browne, China is an economic giant, which rarely takes the necessary measures to solve the nightmare raging the world, global warming. China wants to dine with the rich, but still maintains a developing national mood (Browne 2015). However, it is noble to argue that China is a responsible nation considering its position in Paris. It has a significant impact and role in the rate and direction of global warming. As China is one of the largest economies in the world, its greenhouse gas emissions are immense. Their radiation levels have even exceeded those of the European Union alone. This is attributed to the significant growth of the energy sector and urbanization. The worrying part is that, according to projections,China's per capita emissions would increase more by 2025. Before, countries including China had no serious action plan to mitigate emissions. of greenhouse gases. The 2015 Paris Summit would, therefore, serve as a platform for countries to present their concrete action plans (Oberthür & Wyns 2015). On the other hand, China had to lead the reduction of emissions through agreements. The persistent growth in levels of carbon emissions in the atmosphere has brought far-reaching implications for the climate. Countries have a responsibility to ensure the reduction of carbon emissions to manage global warming. Among them is China, which has a large stake in this. Therefore, China has mitigation strategies in place that would see the level of global warming reduce by reducing carbon emissions. China intends to limit its emissions to a relatively safer level of 2°C with an aspiration of 1.5°C. According to Liu et al. China has launched a series of policies to help the country reach its emissions target. Plans include promoting greenhouse energy, developing coal-fired buildings and transportation by 2020, and controlling HFC-23 emissions, to name a few. Furthermore, the country seeks to implement the cap-and-trade policy, which will significantly reduce carbon pollution. All of his plans would see the country reduce carbon emissions by 50% by 2020 (Liu, et al., 2013). These are among the few policies China is pursuing to achieve the minimum level of carbon emissions as required by previous global agreements. Paris Climate Agreement The French president presented the agreement, a 31-page draft, to more than 180 members for discussion. According to Jayaraman, the obvious expectation was that countries would find a solution to the threat of global warming. Remember that climate variations determine the future environmental state of planet earth. Among the elements was the global temperature target. It required every country to reduce carbon emissions to confine heat to a safer level of 2°C and suction to 1.5. Secondly, the agreement contained the long-term goal of reducing carbon emissions to reach 2°C. Third, it was resolved to take stock every five years as part of promoting accountability. Furthermore, the goal would help monitor members' progress and set ambitious goals. The fourth and fifth factors, well discussed and agreed, concern mechanisms to address financial losses in case of liability due to its effects and the commitment to provide financial support to enable developing countries to adopt climate change strategies (Jayaraman 2015). both active and negative implications in Jayaraman's view. On the bright side, it promotes accountability among nations to ensure that 2°C is achievable. Furthermore, it provides a platform to monitor countries' progress towards achieving the long-term goals contained in the agreement. No country will be subjected to sanctions if it does not make its contribution to achieving the long-term goal. However, sanctions are not part of the treaty and, therefore, may still allow countries to be reluctant. Accountability would be difficult to achieve due to poor governance (Jayaraman). To the extent that the agreement is legally binding, it should ensure that all parts of it contribute to the realization of the long-term objective. These are part of the positive and negative aspects of the climate agreement reached in Paris. Persuading developing countries to.