A View from the Bridge by Arthur Miller was an enjoyable read. It flowed well and was absolutely intriguing. I was really engrossed in the characters and situations Miller developed. I personally like works that focus on an individual's thought processes and course of action when faced with a difficult situation. Eddie Carbone is a well developed and believable character. I appreciate that he wasn't the typical “good” or “bad” guy. He was a good person. However, his desires, of which not even he himself was aware, led him to make poor choices. And realism is the main thing I like about this comedy. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Since this is a play, it has already been made for stage production, which makes the transition to film easier than other literary works since each character's lines and actions are blatantly written. I enjoyed the film adaptation as much as its literary counterpart. It was able to bring to life my visualizations I had while reading. The film adaptation was fantastic and I was able to relive the literature as a critically good film. I give credit to the actors for being able to portray the characters realistically and for bringing their relationships and emotions to life. I also thank the filmmakers for shooting in Red Hook Brooklyn, the very place where the play is set. The settings of the other scenes in the film also successfully portray the world of A View from the Bridge. All these elements created an excellent adaptation. Throughout the play, it is implied that Eddie has hidden desires for his niece, Catherine. I think this implication is successfully portrayed in the film adaptation, particularly in the scenes where they have close interactions. The scene that has the most importance in this regard is the one in which Catherine lights Eddie's cigar. I think that scene conveys the message that Eddie has feelings for Catherine quite clearly. There were many other scenes in the film adaptation that I believed successfully depicted scenes from the play. My only complaint with the film adaptation lies in the ending. I'm a little disappointed that the ending doesn't follow Miller's play. However, I liked the ending of both versions, the literary one and the cinematic one. In the play, Eddie dies during a fight with Marco. While Eddie tried to stab Marco, Marco managed to turn the tables and Eddie ends up dying instead. I like that this scene makes literal and metaphorical sense: Eddie was trying to kill Marco, but ends up dying instead, and Eddie's flaw results in his downfall. In the film adaptation, Eddie commits suicide by throwing himself with a hook. Even though I don't like this change from the comedy, I still liked this ending because it seems to show Eddie's sudden shock and realization at what he has done and his belief that there is no going back, so suicide is the answer. Although different, both endings show how the protagonist's tragic flaw leads to his death. Regardless, both endings are a believable and possible outcome that is still related and tied to the rest of the story. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The film as a whole is a worthy adaptation of the literary work that I consider a success. He managed to bring the characters to life..