'Wij Zijn In' wishes to create a process of choosing future inhabitants for the Brainport Smart District. This short essay will try to solve the problem: what judgment system should be used to select/find future inhabitants, and what assumptions does that system hold to be true? - focus on the fairness of the judgment process from a utilitarian point of view. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay There are several utilitarian theories, for example act utilitarianism (classical) or rule utilitarianism, however they all are based on the same ground which is to achieve “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Utilitarianism can often be associated with hedonism as both lead to people's happiness and well-being (good equals pleasant). Furthermore, it is crucial to remember that not actions, but consequences are what matters, so make intentions irrelevant. Fairness is one of the most important and common ethical values. The entire democratic world and its judicial system are founded on the concept that everyone is equal to each other. However, fairness also means that people at the bottom of the social, economic and political ladder should be favored more (fairness). Consequently, this means that people should be in the same position regarding their basic needs (equality). Furthermore, it is important to state that fairness is considered through actions, processes and consequences, which contradicts the utilitarian view (consequences are what matters most). It was previously decided that diversity (the more diverse, the better) should be one of the factors influencing the judging system. One of the methods to achieve this goal can be positive discrimination. Utilitarians would have nothing against it since this leads to the desired results. However, equity requires that everyone has an equal chance of being eligible for housing in the district. This system would not be suitable for equity as an ethical and moral value since it already denies access to life in the district to some group of people, for example rich or poor, white or black. On the other hand, such a solution is necessary to achieve certain objectives. Accordingly, a utilitarian would say that this method is right. “Asylum seeker crisis” can be used to describe this dilemma. On the one hand, this real-life example should be resolved by preserving the values ​​of fairness: equality and fairness. The origin of people should play no role in the selection process. Therefore, letting asylum seekers compete for seats in the district should be a natural thing. Furthermore, it may also be in our interest to invite these people into the neighborhood and enrich it culturally. On the other hand, a utilitarian may say that indeed this would be right for them, but if most people don't want refugees to go anywhere nearby, they obviously shouldn't be let in, resulting in greater good for most. part of them. citizens in this sense. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay All things considered, one can come to the conclusion that it is difficult for fairness as an ethical value to work according to utilitarian moral theory. At the same time, fairness is the relative term. Undoubtedly, both 'ingredients' will be necessary to evaluate the best judgment process. However, as in any other situation, I personally believe that a bit of wisdom should be used.