IndexIntroductionHuman Rights (essay)ConclusionIntroductionThis essay on human rights highlights the fact that common freedoms are inherent in all human beings and are not granted by the State, and emphasizes the various sets of key principles and values ​​that define human rights, as well as the important work carried out by non-governmental organizations in promoting and protecting these rights in Lebanon. Common liberties are rights that we have fundamentally in light of the fact that we exist as people and are not permitted by any state. These widespread rights are innate in each of us, regardless of identity, gender, social or ethnic origin, shade, religion, language or any other status. They range from the most important ones - the privilege of life - to those for which the daily routine is worth living, for example the right to food, education, work, well-being and freedom. Human rights follow many sets of principles such as universality, inalienability, indivisibility, interdependence and interrelatedness. There are many key values ​​for human rights such as respect, dignity, equality, responsibility, freedom. In Lebanon there are many non-governmental organizations working to promote and protect human rights in many ways. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Human Rights (essay) This part of the essay on human rights emphasizes the universality, inalienability, indivisibility and interdependence of fundamental freedoms, which are essential to the dignity of every human individual and cannot be hierarchically ordered or denied without compromising the enjoyment of other rights. Human rights are universal on the basis that everyone comes into the world with and has similar rights, paying little attention to where they live, their sexual orientation or race, or their rigid social or ethnic foundation. Inalienable since the privileges of individuals can never be removed. Indivisible regardless of whether they identify with common, cultural, financial, political or social issues, fundamental freedoms are natural to the dignity of every human individual. All common freedoms therefore have equivalent status and cannot be placed in instances at multiple levels. The denial of a right constantly hinders happiness with respect to different rights. In this way, everyone's privilege to a satisfying lifestyle cannot be undermined at the expense of various rights, for example the privilege to well-being or the privilege to education. Interdependent and interrelated since each contributes to the recognition of human respect for the individual through the satisfaction of his educational, physical, mental and profound needs. The satisfaction of a right often depends, completely or to a certain extent, on the satisfaction of others. For example, satisfaction of the well-being privilege may depend, under specific conditions, on satisfaction of the advancement, training, or data privilege. Equal and non-discriminatory, all people are equivalent as individuals and in the righteousness of the inalienable pride of every human individual. No one should endure separation based on race, colour, identity, gender, age, language, sexual orientation, etc., as set out in the Fundamental Freedoms Guidelines. Two of the key qualities that lie at the heart of the idea of ​​human rights are human dignity and equality. Human rights can be perceived as characterizing those essential principles that are central to a noble existence; and their completeness derives from the fact thatin this respect, in any case, all men are equivalent. We must not and cannot separate ourselves from each other. These two beliefs, or qualities, are really all that is needed to accept the possibility of common liberties, and these beliefs are not really dubious. This is why common liberties are upheld by every culture on the planet, every socialized government, and every significant religion. It is generally believed that state power cannot be unlimited or self-affirming; it should be limited in any case to the extent that all people within its department can live with certain basic needs for human respect. From these two principles we can obtain numerous different qualities that can help define how individuals and societies should coexist in practice. For example, the freedom, since human will is a significant part of human dignity, to be forced to accomplish something without wanting to denigrate the human soul. Furthermore, respect, because the lack of respect for someone neglects to enhance their distinction and fundamental dignity. Furthermore, responsibility, regarding the privileges of others, entails a duty towards one's own activities and a commitment to the recognition of the rights of each and every one. NGOs range from small-scale groups, for example, on explicit natural concerns or explicit violations of fundamental freedoms, to educational causes, women's shelters, social affiliations, strict associations, legitimate institutions, compassionate aid programs - and the list it could continue - up to immense worldwide associations with hundreds or even large numbers of branches or people in various parts of the world. This reality gives them an incredible criticality for those people who may want to contribute to the improvement of the planet's fundamental freedoms. They can protect and promote human rights by providing information, they work at the local level and they are the people who know the root of the problem of these individuals in a better way than the government. They take a vital role in providing data to the government along with the human-driven arrangement. Education on "human rights" issues contributes to improving the conditions of fundamental freedoms without anyone else doing so because people discover their privileges and subsequently increase their chances of asserting them. Lobbying, hiring extraordinary leaders to evaluate the interests of undervalued people and influencing the government to change its complacency towards society at large. Provide assistance, coming close to giving legitimate help to weak networks that do not understand privilege and cannot bear the cost of legitimate administrations for monetary, social or other reasons. It is normal to worry about NGOs that offer compassionate help and communal freedoms. Elimination of social and health problems, taking a critical role in controlling illegal exploitation, prevention of HIV/AIDS, education on education and preparation of vulnerable individuals, child care, assistance in case of medical problems, promotion of laws and rules on fundamental freedoms between individuals by moving from the near level to the focal level. Finally forming a bridge between the government and the local people, as examined above, NGOs are the only factor that can easily access nearby people and deeply understand their problems. Typically, they undermine and debilitate state power rather than the administration conveying them. They should convey the function of facilitator between individuals and government with advancement and sustainable solutions. Please note: this is just an example. Get a document now,.