IndexHierarchy:Division of labor:Chain of command of the organization:Compound rules and regulations:Generic quality and specialization:Indifference and impersonality:References:The bureaucratic administration model dates back to the ancient civilizations from Egypt to China, India and Rome. He is known for his keen interest in official organization and his insistence on rules, official methods and purely procedural aspects. But it was theoretically developed by Max Weber to make it a model that resembles a silent machine that runs smoothly, with precise coordination and mechanics that ignore human nature, human considerations and different values ​​that are based on creativity and freedom . of the individual. Max Weber (1864-1920) is considered one of the most important sociologists, so he was not only concerned with the management of individual projects but with his interest in large organizations as social units. One of the most important ideas brought by Max Weber to scientific management is the bureaucratic model of management. His analysis of the ideal bureaucratic model is an important starting point for understanding bureaucracy, as it serves as a basis for the study of bureaucratic organizations. This essay will analyze the characteristics of bureaucracy according to Max Weber and whether these are relevant and effective in today's world of management. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay According to CCSE (2013), "etymologically, bureaucracy derives from the word bureaucracy (Germany), bureaucracy (Italy) and burocatie (France), meaning table or office. The term was taken up by the French philosopher, Baron de Grimm, in reference to Vincent de Gournay. Crazia (kratos) alone means power or domination”. Bureaucracy is a system of association known for its size and multifaceted nature and assignments – exists to achieve certain goals. Bureaucrats are found in the state, district, and city dimensions of government, and even large private partnerships might be bureaucratically composed of individuals who work for government organizations, from supervisors and higher state officials to administrative staff, are bureaucrats or civil servants. The administrator of a large urban school area is a public official, similar to educators, accountants, assistants and security personnel. The term "bureaucracy" has been widely used with various meanings coordinated at government and corporate levels. Bureaucracy is a managerial structure intended to achieve normative commitments by methodically planning the work of numerous people. Weber observed that there are three types of authority in associations: conventional, seductive or charismatic, and bureaucratic. He confirmed, after years of research, that the type of bureaucratic power is the optimal one. Max Weber was passionate about investigating hierarchical structure and classified the six main qualities of a perfect bureaucracy; which are like pursuit, hierarchy, division of labor, association chain of importance, composed norms and guidelines, indifference and affairs dependent on specialized aptitudes. He says that regardless of the type of association, open or private, it will exhibit similar attributes. Hierarchy: The key element of bureaucratic association is that there is a progressive system of positions in the association. The chain of importance is an arrangement for placing different positions in the vertical scale from the beginning to the end of the association. In the bureaucratic association, workplaces also pursue the chain of command guideline that everylower office is subject to the control and supervision of the higher office. As a result, no office is left unchecked in the association. This is the main idea of ​​chain of importance in bureaucratic association. This chain of command serves as the correspondence and appointment lines of power. It follows that the descending or ascending correspondence must pass through each position. Likewise, a subordinate will get a specialist from his ready unmatched. In any case, this hierarchical order is distinctly unitary, however sub-pyramids of authority exist within the substantive association it compares and so on there exist useful divisions. In this way, there are workplaces with a similar measure of power but with different types of capabilities working in different capability zones. For example, in government associations we can observe separate workplaces that take care of specific skills. This also occurs in business associations. Division of labor: according to Max Weber, in an association everyone must carry out a particular task. For example, in a college the teachers job is only to educate, the person working in the organization should take care of retention and acquisition. Instructors should not carry out the manager's task obligations and the boss should not educate, everyone in the association has been given explicit commitments and should only carry out such duties. Weber was confident that this type of division of labor will expand the scope of the worker's capabilities in his field and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the association. However, according to the struggle scholar Karl Marx, the division of labor can cause a feeling of estrangement in representatives as it isolates them from other professionals. Additionally, reps can't see and become familiar with the business from start to finish, which could lead to lower profitability. Chain of command of the organization: all representatives working in the association are not approached, its structure is progressive. Each worker is under the expert of a higher position, the structure of the association resembles the pyramid. It makes it clear to workers who is in control and has grassroots leadership experts in the association. On the other hand, it can arouse a feeling of unease among rank-and-file leadership workers, especially those on the lower dimension of the chain of importance. Compound Rules and Regulations: Each of the representatives working in the association works as indicated by the composed principles and guidelines. It provides workers with a clear picture of their business-related obligations. It will likewise stimulate uniform execution, the feeling of solidarity and coherence towards an association. In any case, too many principles and guidelines can lead to an objective shift, representatives may commit to following the standards and neglect their true objective. These rules or guidelines are pretty much constant and thorough. The moment there is no standard on any part of the hierarchical activity, the question is postponed upwards for the choice which consequently becomes a reference point for the future choice on the comparative question. Standards give the advantages of solidity, congruity and consistency and every official knows unequivocally the result of his conduct in a specific matter. Generic quality and specialization: the word generic quality can appear as an antagonistic term; in any case, Max Weber indifferently implied that each representative of the association had to conduct his movement fairly. As indicated by him, he will guarantee equal treatment of representatives 02/05/19]