Over the years, NATO has worked with countries around the world to promote and develop strategic partnerships that enable the organization to support its global allies and project its power beyond the 'Europe. One country with which NATO has developed close relations is Israel, which is officially recognized as a Major Non-Member Partner (MNMP). Events in the Middle East have made it more important than ever for NATO to work alongside nations like Israel, especially when it comes to intelligence sharing and counter-terrorism operations. However, the relationship is not without controversy due to Israel's stance towards the Palestinians and occupation of the West Bank, which has drawn criticism from many European NATO members. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay At the heart of the argument is the question of how far, if at all, NATO should seek to deepen its relationship with Israel and what conditions might be attached to such an agreement. The topic also aims to encourage delegates to consider NATO's role in global security outside its traditional sphere of influence, particularly at a time when many NATO members are facing a growing threat from Islamic extremism. Beyond this, delegates will also need to consider the implications of further cooperation with Israel for international agreements such as the Iran nuclear deal and for the alliance's commitment to collective defense. Israel's relations with the United Nations, as the most important international organization, illustrate this situation well. The right to exist of the Jewish state was confirmed by the General Assembly in November 1947, when it approved the partition of Palestine with a two-thirds majority. Later, as the United Nations membership expanded and the Cold War brought both superpowers to compete for the loyalty of new members, things changed. No country has been censured more often by either the General Assembly or the Security Council. Indeed, often the only thing standing between Israel and further condemnation was the United States. Nor has Jerusalem ever managed to secure a seat on the Security Council. At first glance, Israeli relations with NATO should be better. Founded only a year after Israel, NATO was made up of Christian states, with, since 1952, one exception: Turkey. No NATO member had a fundamental disagreement with the existence of the Jewish state, and most had voted in favor of its creation. Furthermore, Israel's values ​​themselves have always been liberal - albeit initially with a strong socialist twist - and democratic. Partly for this reason, partly because Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion feared that his country would find itself isolated in the event of another world war, Jerusalem took a pro-Western stance during the Cold War. For this, obviously, there was a price to pay. The more pro-Western the position of Jerusalem, the more problematic its relations with the Eastern Bloc. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay During the 1950s, many Israelis believed in a deadly faith. danger coming from the surrounding Arab world. Seeking allies, they would have preferred their country to join NATO or at least become an affiliate member.