Topic > The Issue of Privacy Related to Juvenile Delinquency

Recognizing the critical element of youth recovery through preserving their privacy, the public is now interested in seeking more information about juvenile crime and violence, state authorities, school officials, the public and victims. A growing number of States are meeting this need to allow citizens and offenders to access youth trials, to increase access to youth files, to print and photograph youth offenders, and to amend legislation on extermination of young people's documents. The introduction of protective measures to protect the privacy of young offenders can be seen as the result of the separation of juvenile courts from criminal justice systems. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayIn the book "Juvenile Delinquency: Theory, Practice and Law" by Siegel, L. & B.C. Welsh, it is stated that in the early nineteenth century, delinquent, neglected, and runaway children in the United States were treated equally of adult delinquents. Even children in England, when these children were convicted of crimes they received harsh sentences similar to those of adults, the adult penal code also applied to children and there was no juvenile court. In chapter 13 in the section “Development of Youth Institutions” it is stated that Child Savers influenced state and local government to create special institutions called “Reform Schools,” the first to open was in Westborough, Massachusetts in 1848, then in Rochester, New York in 1894, later programs claimed to develop and began in Ohio in 1850 and in Maine, Rhode Island and then Michigan in 1906. According to the article "Juvenile Proceedings and Records" it states that "When the first juvenile court was created in Chicago, Illinois, in 1899, was designed to "spare juveniles from the harsh proceedings of adult courts, the punitive and undignified conditions of adult jails and penitentiaries, and the stigma of being labeled 'criminals,'" according to an article by Tamryn J. Etten and Robert F. Petrone in the Juvenile and Family Court Journal (Juvenile Proceedings and Records).” The idea of ​​keeping juvenile trials and documents confidential was to create the “New” youth justice management system. Less punitive and therapeutic than the regime for adults, also due to the introduction of policies to protect the privacy of juvenile delinquents. With youth crime increasingly widespread and violent, government politicians have been under pressure to pass laws that emphasize young people's responsibility for violent crime. The government's focus on rehabilitation and protection of minors from exposure has not been difficult and according to a latest study analysis by the NCJJ. The article “Juvenile Proceedings and Records“ also states that youth records usually focus on interactions between youth and different states, local service providers, and youth culture. It also stated that “juvenile history records social histories are often included in information about a young person's family, academic records as well as any type of history of abuse or neglect as well as problems with drug and alcohol use,” meaning that social histories are often included in information about young person's family, academic records also contain any kind of history of problems. Legal documents contain information about any young offenders in their court proceedings and contain any information that can be used as evidence, such as. 493)