The famous speech given by Elie Wiesel entitled "The Dangers of Indifference" was one of the best speeches he gave. Wiesel used rhetorical strategies to demonstrate his message. That indifference it is worse than hate It questions the morals of others Elie used ethos, pathos, logo and kairos Wiesel begins with pathos building emotions towards the Holocaust, then uses logos to begin to explain this. 'is indifference and reasons with the logic of people the tone of speech, style and his character are what defines his ethics. Say no to plagiarism Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be prohibited"? Get an original essay Finally, he uses a specific kairos example that shows that the United States had the opportunity to do something, but nothing was done. Although his speech contains some incorrect statements, this does not hinder his argument . Overall, the author of this speech effectively persuades the audience to understand the message through appeals. The first appeal used is pathos, developing the audience's emotions, capable of attracting their attention and ensuring that the audience sympathizes with the victims. The use of anecdotes helps develop the audience's feelings and paint a picture of the field. The first is a description of his liberation and his feelings. The phrase “He was free at last, but there was no joy in his heart. He thought he would never be there again” shows that he has given up and the audience begins to stress with him as well as the other survivors. This causes the audience to question their own morals and cause them to view indifference as a problem. The use of anecdotes helps to develop another image that the audience can identify with and begin to feel for the victims of the Holocaust. Wiesel wants the audience to feel uncomfortable, he wants them to feel a mixture of pain and remorse, so that when he starts asking difficult, rhetorical questions, they will actually take the time to think about it. have they learned from the past? Does it mean that society has changed? Has human beings become less indifferent and more human? Have we really learned from our experiences? Are we less insensitive to the plight of victims of ethnic cleansing and other forms of injustice in places near and far? Is today's justified intervention in Kosovo, led by you, Mr President, a lasting warning that the deportation and terrorization of children and their parents will never again be permitted anywhere in the world? Will it discourage other dictators in other countries from doing the same? Wiesel won't provide an answer, and doesn't. So now it's up to the public to decide, act and choose not to be indifferent so that society can truly change. He divides his speech into 6 sections. Elie Wiesel began many of his speeches with a story, and "The Perils of Indifference" is no different. In section 1, he talks about his liberation from Buchenwald 54 years earlier and why he was, and still is, so grateful to the Americans. .Section 2, According to Wiesel, it might seem easy and harmless to ignore the atrocities, but the effect is far from trivial. Indifference might seem harmless but it is not. Section 3, Elie believes that all wars and battles fought are due to indifference, he names many of the countries' murders and bloodbaths. Section 4, during the Holocaust classified people in 3 ways: killers, victims and bystanders. There were people called the "Righteous Gentiles", they are the ones who help fight the Nazis and liberate the Jews from the concentration camps. Section 5, it turns out that the Pentagon had information about what Hitler was doing to the Jews in Europe, and FDR and the.