This document will discuss what motivational interviewing is, who developed motivational interviewing, and why it was developed. Furthermore, the most important aspects of motivational interviewing will be covered. Additionally, the article will discuss how I hope to use motivational interviewing in the future. By the conclusion of the article the reader should have a better understanding of motivational interviewing. Definition of Motivational Interviewing“Motivational interviewing was introduced by Dr. William R. Miller in 1983, to help problem drinkers prepare for treatment and was developed in collaboration with Dr. Stephen Rollnick. Motivational interviewing is a client-centered, directive communication method for improving intrinsic motivation for change by helping people explore and work through ambivalence. (Miller and Rollnick, 2002).” This definition simply means that motivational interviewing is a method that uses the techniques taught by Carl Rodgers, such as empathy, positive regard, and congruence, which lead to a collaborative relationship between the counselor and the client. This supportive and collaborative relationship will allow the client to open up and have honest discussions with the counselor. Therefore, the counselor will be able to help the client recognize: 1) The advantages and disadvantages of changing his negative behavior 2) Whether he is able to change his negative behavior 3) Whether or not he intends to change his negative behavior The counselor accomplishes the above by expressing empathy, developing discrepancies, accommodating resistance, and supporting self-efficacy. Furthermore, the consultant guides the client towards a solution that will lead to a permanent position...... middle of paper ......hours, motivational interviewing encourages the consultant to use statements that are something that is most likely missing the life of a teenager. I also believe that motivational interviewing will be useful when counseling a wide range of individuals. Conclusion Motivational interviewing is based on a client-centered therapeutic approach that uses open-ended questions, statements, reflective listening and summaries to help the client recognize the pros and cons of change and their reasons for resisting change, thus eliminating their ambivalence about change. Once the client addresses their ambivalence, Miller and Rollick believe the client will be able to make the necessary changes. Furthermore, motivational interviewing induces the client to support the change and not the consultant. Furthermore, the client, not the counselor, is responsible for his or her own progress.